Worked example · Entitlement

The deal did not fail. It just took nineteen months longer than the model.

A worked example of an entitlement timeline, and why delay is the risk that quietly outranks cost.

September 2026 · 8 min read

A worked example, not a client file. The sequence is typical; the months are illustrative.

Cost overruns get the attention because they arrive as invoices. Delay arrives as nothing at all — no letter, no line item, just another month where the carry runs and nothing is sellable.

On a levered deal, delay is usually the larger of the two.

  1. 01Pre-application · modelled 1, took 2Staff are booked three weeks out. The first meeting produces a list of studies nobody budgeted.
  2. 02Studies · modelled 3, took 6Traffic, drainage, environmental, and a wetland delineation the seller swore was not needed. Two of them can run in parallel. The wetland one cannot.
  3. 03Formal submittal · modelled 1, took 1The only stage that behaved.
  4. 04Review cycles · modelled 3, took 9Three rounds of comments rather than one. Each round is a full review clock, not a continuation of the last.
  5. 05Public hearing · modelled 2, took 7Continued once at a neighbour's request, then again when a commissioner was absent. Hearings are calendars, not decisions.
  6. 06Recording and permits · modelled 1, took 5Conditions of approval had to be satisfied before recording, and two of them needed a utility company with its own queue.
An entitlement sequence that was modelled at eleven months.
11 moModelled
30 moActual
+19 moOf carry nobody priced

Why the model broke

Not because any single step was unreasonable. Because the model assumed every step ran once, in sequence, at the posted duration — and entitlement is a queue of queues, each with its own clock and each able to restart.

Nineteen months of carry on a levered basis is not a delay. It is the return.

What we would actually do

  • Model three timelines: posted, realistic, and bad. Underwrite the middle one and survive the third.
  • Ask the jurisdiction how many review rounds the last five comparable applications took. It is public, and it is the single most predictive number available.
  • Identify which studies can run in parallel and start those the week of the LOI, not after closing.
  • Price the carry per month explicitly so the cost of a slipped hearing is visible on the page rather than absorbed.
  • Negotiate the contingency period against the realistic timeline, not the posted one.
  • Know which conditions of approval depend on a third party, because those are the ones with no deadline at all.

This deal still made money. It made roughly a third of what the model said, which is a different conversation to have before an investor's capital is in than after.

← All field notes